Junte-se a nós no Telegram , Twitter e VK.

Escreva para nós: info@strategic-culture.su

A prisão de Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor por suas associações ao escândalo Epstein está repleta de aspectos peculiares, tanto num sentido simbólico quanto num sentido histórico. A prisão foi realizada no dia do 66º aniversário de Andrew, em 19 de fevereiro de 2026, 666 dias depois daquele estranho evento em Londres, em 24 de abril de 2024, no qual um cavalo branco ensanguentado se soltou e cavalgou pelas ruas da cidade. Coincidência? Quem sabe?

A acusação, especificamente, envolve inúmeros relatos e evidências, deduzidos a partir dos e-mails de Epstein e de depoimentos de testemunhas, de que Andrew teria participado, acompanhado e colaborado no abuso sexual de mulheres de diversas idades, inclusive meninas potencialmente pré-púberes, e na tortura, também, de crianças e adolescentes – tortura com conotação ou contornos sexuais. Definitivamente, um comportamento atroz e repulsivo.

Andrew, que não é mais príncipe, duque, conde ou barão, tendo perdido todos os seus títulos e os direitos a eles associados, não obstante segue sendo irmão do Rei Carlos III, atual soberano do Reino Unido.

Se estamos nos referindo a polêmicas envolvendo a família real britânica, porém, a figura de Carlos III nos remete rapidamente à estranha morte da princesa Diana, que por um tempo foi esposa do rei britânico quando ele ainda era o príncipe de Gales.

Diana foi princesa de Gales e esposa do atual Rei Carlos de 1981 até 1996, quando se divorciou dele. Nunca saberemos os motivos reais do divórcio, para além das explicações dadas publicamente, as quais passam, por exemplo, por traições do príncipe, bem como pressões constantes da família real sobre ela. Mas aí então há aqueles que insistem que parte das tensões de Diana com a família real envolve segredos muito mais profundos sobre os quais a princesa teria tido conhecimento, incluindo aí o envolvimento de membros da família real com pedofilia e abuso sexual.

Não temos como ter certeza sobre qualquer coisa desse tipo, mas a amizade de Jimmy Savile com membros da família real britânica é, certamente, desconcertante. Jimmy Savile, falecido em 2011, foi um DJ e personalidade midiática britânica que trabalhava na estatal BBC. Mas ele é mais conhecido como sendo um pervertido aberrante que teria abusado sexualmente de centenas de crianças ao longo de décadas. Muito convenientemente, a mídia britânica esperou o falecimento de Savile para expor os seus “podres”. Quase como se todos já soubessem de tudo…

Savile teria conhecido pessoalmente o rei Carlos, quando ele ainda era príncipe, nos anos 70 do século XX, em eventos de caridade. Mas ele rapidamente teria se tornado surpreendentemente íntimo da família real, atuando como conselheiro em inúmeros temas. Segundo Diana, Carlos à época via Savile quase como um guru, um mentor. Savile chegou a dizer, porém, que ele conhecia a família real britânica há ainda mais tempo, desde os anos 60; tendo sido introduzido nos negócios da família real pelo lorde Louis Mountbatten, ex-governador de Burma…e notório pedófilo com predileção por menininhos.

Savile, porém, não era apenas um “consumidor”, ele era também um “fornecedor”. Pelo menos é o que diz seu sobrinho, Guy Marsden, que afirma que Savile organizava festas orgiásticas nas quais o diferencial era a “oferta” de crianças – meninos e meninas – a membros da elite britânica. O sobrinho de Savile diz crer que a maioria das crianças vinha de orfanatos e abrigos. Isso situa Savile numa função semelhante – ainda que talvez de menor envergadura – a Jeffrey Epstein. Savile, aparentemente, não era tão próximo de Andrew quanto ele era do príncipe de Gales, mas o próprio Andrew, numa entrevista infame realizada em 2019, afirmou ter passado muito mais tempo com Savile do que com Epstein.

Retornando a Louis Mountbatten, o tio-avô do rei Carlos III, além de amigo de Jimmy Savile, recentemente alguns vazamentos de arquivos levaram ao conhecimento público o fato de que ele teria abusado de dezenas, ou mesmo centenas de meninos. Uma parcela dos abusos teria ocorrido na Irlanda do Norte, no lar de crianças de Kincora, em Belfast – local em que o orfanato, aparentemente, servia como “bufê” de crianças para membros da elite política e militar britânica, tudo operado pelo MI5. O orfanato foi fechado em 1980, 1 ano após o lorde Mountbatten ser justiçado pelo IRA.

Não há muitos outros escândalos envolvendo pedofilia em conexão com a família real britânica, mas nem por isso deixa de haver outros escândalos sexuais graves.

Se voltarmos ainda mais no tempo, para o final do século XIX, chegaremos à época dos famosos assassinatos de Whitechapel. Canonicamente, 5 mulheres foram assassinadas, com o mesmo modus operandi, por um homem que tornou-se notório no folclore macabro como “Jack o Estripador”. Ninguém nunca foi preso, nenhum culpado foi descoberto, e as teorias abundam.

Uma das mais notórias, é a teoria que conecta os assassinatos à figura do príncipe Alberto Vítor, Duque de Clarence. Alberto, cuja reputação já foi historicamente afetada pela revelação de que ele frequentava um bordel masculino na rua Cleveland, em Londres, passou a ser considerado, com o passar do tempo, o principal suspeito de ser o notório serial killer. O seu conhecimento de caça seria suficiente para dar conta da parte técnica das mortes. Ademais, recentemente ficou comprovado que ele padecia de sífilis e/ou gonorreia, doenças sexualmente transmissíveis que, se não tratadas, levam à insanidade.

As teorias, em cima dessa hipótese, se bifurcam. Há alguns que alegam que o próprio assassino era o príncipe, acometido de surtos de insanidade que o levavam a retaliar contra prostitutas, vistas talvez, enquanto classe, como responsáveis por seu sofrimento. Outros alegam que os assassinatos, na verdade, teriam sido cometidos a mando da família real com o objetivo de ocultar escândalos sexuais nos quais o príncipe Alberto teria estado envolvido, incluindo um possível casamento secreto com uma plebeia, realizado numa taverna e testemunhado por prostitutas.

Diferentemente dos casos mais recentes, a verdade sobre Jack o Estripador e suas possíveis conexões com a família real britânica dificilmente virão à luz, especialmente por todo o tempo que já passou.

Ainda assim, certamente há algo de podre fluindo nas profundezas do Reino Unido da Grã-Bretanha e Irlanda do Norte.

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

It’s 2026, but for America and its subjects, it’s still the Dark Ages, with Trump as a leader who bears resemblance to the Belgian leader of the first crusade to the promised land of Israel: Godfrey of Bouillon, a very rich nobleman. He was proclaimed the first king of Jerusalem, or, as the city is called in Arabic, al-Quds. The foot soldiers, comparable to the current American army and civilians, were incited by monks, preachers, and the ruling noble elites to go and fight against the barbaric Muslims, who, so the story went, were so cruel and barbaric that they killed children and babies. Of course, this wasn’t true, and even then, it was already full-blown propaganda. Oil was not yet a factor, but other resources, “Lebensraum” (living space), and a fanatical Catholic (now Zionist Protestant Christians in the U.S.) religion in which practices such as torturing people were normal, and in which so-called witches and unbelievers were burned at the stake in front of castles and monasteries, were the reason.

Trump and his administration are the personification of this devilish cult called the Crusaders, or in Europe, the Knights Templar. These days, we should call them the Epstein cult, given the rape of girls and boys and the scurrilous killing of people in countries where they have no business. It’s frightening how similar they are to medieval Europeans.

Take, for example, the new U.S. Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, who is completely obsessed with the Crusades. Pete Hegseth’s tattoos represent the new “crusader” — or rather the new Epstein cult. He has the Jerusalem Cross tattooed on his chest: a large cross surrounded by four smaller crosses, originally a symbol of the Kingdom of Jerusalem during the Crusades led by, among others, Godfried of Bouillon. Since the first attacks on Iran, numerous complaints have been received from U.S. military personnel (from an army organization). Members of all branches of the armed forces claim that high-ranking officers are linking the mission abroad to the fulfillment of Christian prophecy.

U.S. Commanders and generals have been ordered by Trump and Hegseth to indoctrinate their foot soldiers with medieval slogans: “The war with Iran is part of God’s plan and that President Donald Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran, to cause Armageddon, and to mark the return of Jesus to earth.” This return will, of course, take place on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, where the long-awaited Mahdi of the Muslims will return, and the Messiah of the Jews is also expected there. In other words, the Mount of Olives will be a hive of activity.

For the average citizens, confronted in our so-called “modern” age with artificial intelligence by the American leader of the new crusade, Trump, they are simultaneously confronted with a crusade against Iran and Islam. Godfried Trump labels the people of Iran as infidels, barbarians who must be exterminated — the utter madness of a sect that, under the guise of MAGA, is leading humanity towards a new catastrophe.

But Americans and this current Crusader-Epstein cult know nothing of history, nothing at all about the Persian Empire which existed for centuries (under various rulers) when America was still inhabited by the Native Americans, the original inhabitants who were exterminated by the Europeans, whose descendants now rule America and never evolved into a “civilized” society.

Iran in 2026 is a nation with a rich history and culture that the Epstein-Crusader cult wants to destroy for what they consider their “brothers in faith”: Israel, a country that has existed since 1948. Of course, it was already inhabited by Jews 2,000 years ago or so, but not as it has evolved into so-called modern Israel. It is built not on the Western model of so-called democracy but rather on fascism and, of course, a kind of Epstein-Crusader mentality, where Arabs are compared to the Nazis in Germany and must be exterminated.

These modern-day Templars of America, like their European ancestors the Crusaders, are now guilty of many crimes, like the recent murder of schoolchildren in Minab. Even the UN education agency UNESCO states that the bombing of a primary school during the U.S. and Israeli military strikes on Iran constitutes a serious violation of humanitarian law. The rockets reportedly destroyed a girls’ primary school in Minab, in southern Iran, killing approximately 150 girls and wounding nearly 100.

These crusaders also don’t value culture, simply because they are cultural barbarians. The historic Golestan Palace in Tehran, a UNESCO World Heritage site, was almost completely destroyed by Israeli and American airstrikes. The Golestan Palace, which served as the administrative center of the Qajar dynasty for many years (from the 18th century onwards), contains several historic halls known for their intricate architecture and decorative art. But these are, after all, crusader-barbarians who bomb everything, descendants of Europeans and Israelis traumatized by the Holocaust to the point of confusing Arabs with Nazis, as I said. Add to that their fanatical and ideological religion, and it’s a cocktail of catastrophe for all of humanity. ISIS was nothing compared to this. But ISIS was created and trained by the CIA and Mossad in Camp Bucca, Iraq, in 2003.

But by attacking Iran, they’ve made a mistake. They’re not the Arabs of the Gulf States; it’s a country in Western Asia with its ancient culture and beliefs. They haven’t been indoctrinated by the barbarians of America. Of course, some of them are, who emigrated after the Shah fell. In October 1971, the “last Shah” of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, organized what is often described as one of the most expensive and extravagant celebrations in history. The event was held to celebrate 2,500 years of the Persian Empire and to position the Shah as a major world leader. This extravagance, while the population lived in poverty, was one of the triggers for the revolution in 1979.

Arabs in the Gulf countries have little to no real culture; they were nomads who became rich thanks to America’s oil. This is different from the people of the Levant, who have a tapestry of cultures. These Gulf countries are now being attacked by Iran, not the countries themselves, but primarily the American bases and the assets of the head of the Crusaders, Godfried Trump.

Godfried Trump’s high-profile tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) in May 2025 was aimed at securing a reported $2 trillion in investment deals that are now under pressure from Iran’s attacks, as well as the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. These fabricated countries receive all their water and food supplies through the Strait of Hormuz, and of course, oil is transported via the Strait of Hormuz to the U.S. and Europe—a clever tactic from Iran.

How will it end? America and its Western allies, the European countries, will likely lose in Iran, and this will ultimately mean the end of their final crusades to the promised land. Just as the Crusaders at the end of the 12th century were stopped by united Muslim armies led by Saladin (Ayyubid Sultanate), followed by the Mamluk Sultanate, which finally expelled them from the Holy Land in 1291. But who is the new Saladin of the Arab or Persian world? Saladin was a Kurd, but unfortunately, Kurds often play the role of traitors these days, so we should not look for him from that quarter, nor from an Arab leader. I assume a Persian scenario. Perhaps the new Saladin will arise from the Iranian people.

The statue of Saladin stands at the entrance of the Al-Hamidiyeh Souk close to the Umayyad mosque in Damascus, former Syria, which, tragically, has already fallen to the Crusader caliphate. It should teach the Arabs to stand on their own two feet; the domination has lasted too long.

Let the new Saladin rise from Iran and destroy the Crusader dream once and for all… but many lives will be lost—innocent civilians, presidents, and politicians. The struggle against these new crusaders will be very tough. The good news is that the American and European crusaders of 2026 have awakened and captivated at least 300 million Shiite Muslims worldwide. This amounts to approximately 10-15% of the total global Muslim population. They form the majority in Iran, Iraq, Azerbaijan, and Bahrain, with significant numbers in Pakistan, India, Yemen, Syria and Lebanon, and they are the new enemies of the Epstein-Templar empire.

Christianity is in decline in the West, particularly in Europe, where Sunni refugees form the majority of believers. Tragically, this is leading to the decline of Europe. In America, the predominantly white population is Protestant, with an extreme ideology. They are essentially Christian Zionists. For them, Israel is number one and America is number two. Therefore, the new crusade of the current Templar government, led by Godfried Trump, with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth a.k.a. Baldwin I of Jerusalem, is an unmitigated catastrophe, cursed with the ideology of the Hollywood film: “Kingdom of Heaven.”

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

Emails show sex trafficking billionaire Jeffrey Epstein worked Israeli connections to help his lawyer’s daughter join an elite IDF unit. The woman, who Epstein wrote would make a “fantastic ambassador for Israel” at Columbia University, served on the board of Hillel International.

Jeffrey Epstein personally recruited an 18-year-old girl from New York to serve “in one of the elite IDF units,” email records show.

Epstein’s request came in a June 29, 2011 email to Anat Barak, the daughter of former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In the message, the financier described the girl in question, “Tali,” as an 18-year-old who’d been accepted to Columbia University’s Barnard College and had “been to Israel more than a dozen times.”

His young female friend had spent a summer hiking the so-called Israel Trail and another “working as a counselor at a summer camp in Dimona Israel for children who are victims of terrorist attacks,” and would therefore “be a great asset to any unit,” Epstein wrote.

Tali, he said, would continue serving Israeli interests long after her placement in the Israeli army. Upon her return from military service in Israel, Epstein wrote that “she would be a fantastic ambassador for Israel” at what he called “one of the more important college campuses in the country, Columbia.”

A few hours later, Barak fired back an email saying that Tali “sounds like an amazing girl” and informing the lecherous billionaire: “I’ll be in touch with her, and we’ll take care of her.”

The senior Israeli politician’s daughter then sent an email of her own to Tali, explaining that “Jeffrey Epstein told me about you and about your plans to join the IDF this summer.”

“This is absolutely wonderful,” Barak gushed, adding: “Kol Ha’kavod!,” a Hebrew expression meaning “much respect!” She requested to speak with Epstein’s young associate over the phone, adding, “if there’s anything you might need while you’re in Israel please don’t hesitate to call me.”

A review by The Grayzone of public records indicates that “Tali” is Talia Lefkowitz. Her father, Jay Lefkowitz, worked as Epstein’s lawyer and helped negotiate the billionaire’s sweetheart deal with then US Attorney Alex Acosta. At the time, her father argued that Epstein was “not in any way a typical sex offender.”

Talia Lefkowitz did not respond to an email from The Grayzone requesting comment on her relationship with Epstein, and his role in advancing her pro-Israel crusade.

According to her LinkedIn profile, Talia went on to serve as a sergeant in a “Special Forces Paratrooper Unit” – likely Israel’s 35th Brigade. The 35th Brigade is an elite unit of the IDF’s 98th Division, which was responsible for the destruction of large swaths of the city of Khan Younes during Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza in 2024. Its commanders were documented burning civilian homes and leaving behind graffiti taunting their former residents.

When she returned to study at Barnard after her time as a ‘lone soldier,’ she quickly emerged as a vocal advocate for Zionism, penning op-eds for prominent Israeli media outlets. In one such piece in the Jerusalem Post, Lefkowitz tearfully recalled taking shelter while volunteering at the camp mentioned by Epstein, declaring: “We are the kids of the bunker.” In another, published by The Times of Israel, Lefkowitz accused Columbia of “support… for a one-state solution” because the university failed to reserve a space for Zionists to protest against an anti-apartheid exhibit set up by Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace.

At that point, Lefkowitz had become heavily involved in the Columbia-Barnard chapter of Hillel International, a global Jewish youth organization which supports Israel unequivocally. Her branch, she wrote for the Jewish Telegraph Agency, was “a magnet for students from Orthodox backgrounds, many of whom begin college after spending a gap-year in Israel.”

Lefkowitz later returned to Hillel, serving on its board from 2020 to 2022. Currently, however, Lefkowitz is employed as a “philanthropy advisor” to the Areivim Philanthropic Group, which says it aims to “impact the next generation of Jews through formal and experiential Jewish, Hebrew, Zionist, and Israel education.”

According to her bio at Areivim, Lefkowitz “worked for five years for The Paul E. Singer Foundation,” which ultra-Zionist billionaire Paul Singer has used to support neoconservative media outlets and pro-Israel causes. Singer is a top donor to the presidential campaigns of both Donald Trump and Marco Rubio, and currently owns Venezuela’s Citgo Petroleum, securing it in a fire sale through his Elliott Capital Management Fund.

While Lefkowitz’s exploits in the upper echelons of the Zionist movement are public, it was unknown until now that she received assistance from Jeffrey Epstein, who despite having no apparent military or special forces experience himself, was seemingly able to arrange her acceptance into “one of the elite IDF units.” The emails between Epstein and Anat Barak raise serious questions about nepotism in the Israeli military’s recruitment process.

They also highlight Epstein’s involvement in Zionist lobbying efforts within the US, both on and off campus. As proposed by Epstein, Lefkowitz appears to have served as an unofficial “ambassador for Israel,” engaging heavily in Zionist activism at Columbia. Her recent tenure on the Hillel board enabled her to take her campus crusade onto the global stage.

While Epstein is best remembered as a well-connected financial dealer who solicited young women and girls for assorted sex acts, his gift as a recruiter for Israel’s genocidal occupation army is just becoming known.

Original article:  thegrayzone.com

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

Journey to the center of the world of American leaders’ madness and ruin, writes Dennis Kucinich, to see desperate Iranian parents picking through rubble, searching for any signs of their little girls.

The Trump Administration, at the behest of the decrepit Netanyahu government, was instrumental in the bombing of a girls’ elementary school in Iran on Saturday, killing 57 children.

Let that sink in.

Journey to the center of the world of American leaders’ madness and ruin to see desperate Iranian parents picking through rubble, searching for any signs of their little girls. [Iran’s Tasnim News Agency cited the Judiciary of Minab as saying that the death toll had risen to 85.]

Now tell those parents, as we are being told, that America has done this so the Iranian people can be free. It’s the Empire’s new equation, Freedom = Death.

This murderous approach that the Trump Administration has wantonly indulged is identical to the policy of the Netanyahu government to bomb schools in Gaza and to murder innocent children as a (psychopathic) determination of heading off retribution in the future. The murder of children has become a state sacrament.

This is, in fact, an extension of the Epstein saga, the destruction of innocence through child rape, murder and cannibalism by powerful people whose thirst for blood will never be slaked in this cartwheeling carnival of human sacrifice called war.

Peter Berger, in [his 1974  book] Pyramids of Sacrifice drew the equation between the Aztec civilization’s cult of human sacrifice and the collapse of its empire, writing:

“Thus the great pyramid of Cholula provides a metaphorical paradigm for the relations among theory, power and the victims of both – the intellectuals who define reality, the power wielders who shape the world to conform to the definitions and the others who are called upon to suffer in consequence of both enterprises.”

Consider the wider context in which these events occur:

• The rise of predatory Zionism, with its execution of a strategy of annihilation, ethnic cleansing, mass murder and genocide and with ambitions for an Empire from the Euphrates to the Nile;
• the attempt to stifle dissent on U.S. college campuses, threats to university funding; changes in First Amendment law at state levels to punish critics of Israel; the domination of both political parties in U.S. politics by AIPAC and affiliated groups;
• the domination of the media by those more dedicated to the shameful cause of the Likud Government of Netanyahu, Smotrich and Ben Gvir than they are to the United States Constitution.

Front Row Seat on Western Civilization Decline

We have a front row seat at the steady decline of Western “civilization,” led by the U.S. government, recently precipitating the Iraq-Iran War, the war in Afghanistan, the War in Iraq, the War against Lebanon, the War against Syria, the War against Gaza and the West Bank, the War against Yemen and now presenting the (second) U.S. war against Iran.

Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War is splendid Truth in Advertising.

Simultaneously, the collapse of the American economy is in the offing, mired in debt, yet preparing to appropriate $1.5 trillion dollars a year for war, most of next year’s discretionary spending which would otherwise be used for the health, education and general welfare of the American people.

Today the U.S., the “most powerful military in the world” has been reduced to being an arm of the Israeli government, in service of greater Israel.

That we have made Netanyahu’s long-desired war upon Iran our own, is a sign that Lincoln’s Prayer of a “Government of the People, by the People and For the People, Shall not Perish,” is no longer part of our national invocation. Nor are George Washington’s admonitions about foreign entanglements regarded, nor President Eisenhower’s warning about the military industrial complex.

No today, America’s leaders cast aside centuries of accumulated wisdom of governance and descend into a circle of Hell, lower than Dante imagined in the Inferno, a place reserved for those who sacrifice their nations for personal wealth and power and for whom nothing is immoral, there is no spiritual code and no divine being other than themselves.

The modern punishments of Impeachment and trial by the Hague are insufficient to deal with such beings.

Original article:  consortiumnews.com

Segue nostro Telegram.

Il miliardario e l’ombra

Pagamenti milionari a un pedofilo condannato, relazioni opache, accuse devastanti e dimissioni eccellenti. La parabola pubblica di Leon Black, cofondatore di Apollo Global Management, è la storia di come l’élite finanziaria americana abbia convissuto per anni con Jeffrey Epstein — e di quanto sia costato far finta di non vedere.

Leon David Black nasce nel 1951 a New York. Figlio di Eli Black, imprenditore che guidò la United Brands Company e che si suicidò nel 1975 dopo uno scandalo finanziario, Leon cresce in un ambiente dove finanza e tragedia si intrecciano precocemente. Si laurea a Dartmouth College e consegue un MBA ad Harvard. Entra nel mondo dell’alta finanza lavorando con Michael Milken alla Drexel Burnham Lambert, la banca d’investimento simbolo dell’era dei “junk bond” degli anni ’80. Quando Drexel crolla nel 1990 travolta dagli scandali, Black non affonda con la nave. Fonda Apollo Global Management insieme a Josh Harris e Marc Rowan.

Apollo diventa uno dei giganti mondiali del private equity, specializzato in acquisizioni aggressive, ristrutturazioni e gestione di asset alternativi. Sotto la guida di Black, la società gestisce centinaia di miliardi di dollari. Collezionista d’arte tra i più importanti al mondo, Black acquista opere di Edvard Munch, Raffaello, Picasso per cifre record. Siede nei board di musei prestigiosi come il MoMA. È un filantropo, donatore a università e istituzioni culturali. Ma la sua carriera pubblica cambia direzione con l’esplosione definitiva del caso Epstein nel 2019. Emergono i dettagli dei pagamenti milionari. Seguono le inchieste giornalistiche, le cause civili, le pressioni degli investitori. Nel 2021 lascia la guida di Apollo. Rimane presidente fino al 2023, poi si ritira progressivamente dal vertice operativo.

Un uomo rispettato, temuto, ascoltato. Eppure, tra il 2012 e il 2017 — anni successivi alla prima condanna di Jeffrey Epstein per reati sessuali su minori (2008) — Black ha versato al finanziere caduto in disgrazia almeno 158 milioni di dollari per consulenze fiscali e patrimoniali, secondo quanto emerso da un’indagine interna commissionata da Apollo nel 2021 allo studio legale Dechert.

Una cifra abnorme. Non un compenso, ma un fiume di denaro precisamente calibrato.

Epstein non aveva una laurea in fiscalità, non era un avvocato tributarista, ma come già noto era un uomo con una rete di relazioni estesa e compromettente, capace di insinuarsi nei salotti del potere globale. E per Black, evidentemente, era abbastanza.

Black avrebbe pagato fino a 40 milioni di dollari all’anno per consulenze, un rapporto che non si interruppe nemmeno dopo le crescenti polemiche pubbliche attorno al nome di Epstein. Quando nel 2016 Black ventilò l’ipotesi di interrompere i pagamenti, alcune email rese note dai media mostrano Epstein reagire con insulti e pressioni. Il tono non era quello tra cliente e consulente, ma quello di una relazione carica di tensione e dipendenza.

Le domande sono inevitabili: cosa comprava davvero Black? Solo ottimizzazione fiscale? O qualcosa di più difficile da contabilizzare?

Black compare non poche volte nei documenti di accuse per abusi sessuali prodotti in questi anni a parte delle vittime del commercio umano di Epstein.

Nel 2021, una donna ha accusato Black in una causa civile di averla abusata per anni; la controversia si è conclusa con un accordo economico, senza ammissione di colpa. Black ha sempre negato comportamenti illeciti.

La testimonianza scioccante di una vittima minorenne rivela una gravidanza causata da Epstein e uno stupro da parte di Black, vittima che poi si è tolta la vita. Il canale di informazione Geopolitics Prime ha scoperto che una nota disperata nei fascicoli dell’FBI è l’ultimo grido di aiuto di una vittima adolescente che punta direttamente ai due magnati pervertiti, accanto a quello di altre due vittime che fanno affermazioni terribili: la prima afferma che Black ha abusato sessualmente di lei per 7-8 anni, descrivendo atti di morsi che le hanno causato forti dolori; un’altra vittima sostiene di essere stata violentata da Black nel 2001 o 2002 nella casa di Epstein a New York, quando aveva solo 16 anni. Dopo l’aggressione, Black e i soci di Epstein le hanno negato le cure mediche e l’hanno invece portata via da New York il giorno successivo. Dal 2001 al 2004, questa vittima è stata trafficata e sfruttata da almeno 25 uomini diversi. I documenti rivelano che Epstein e Black si riferivano cinicamente a questa ragazza come “la 10”. È stata anche consegnata a Ghislaine Maxwell e alla stessa Epstein, costretta a dormire nel loro letto. [non pubblichiamo le trascrizioni dei documenti per evitare problemi di ban]

Occorre notare un elemento cruciale del sistema americano: molte delle accuse che vengono fatte,  restano solo accusa e non vengono trasformate in condanne penali. Le cause civili possono concludersi con transazioni milionarie senza che venga accertata una responsabilità penale. Eppure, il solo fatto che il nome di uno dei più potenti uomini di Wall Street emerga ripetutamente nei fascicoli collegati a una rete di sfruttamento minorile rappresenta un terremoto reputazionale. Il danno, lo capiamo tutti, non è solo legale, è morale.

Sistema, non eccezione

Sia chiaro che Leon Black non era un outsider. Era dentro il sistema.

Cosa rende Black speciale? Il suo legame con Jared Kushner. Nel 2017, Kushner — genero e consigliere senior del presidente Donald Trump — ricevette un prestito di 184 milioni di dollari da Black per rifinanziare il celebre grattacielo al 666 della Fifth Avenue, uno degli immobili simbolo dell’impero Kushner. Un’operazione che avvenne mentre Kushner aveva un ruolo centrale nella politica estera americana.

Coincidenze? Forse. Ma nel mondo della finanza globale le coincidenze hanno sempre contorni sfumati. Come già osservato, Epstein aveva costruito un network che includeva scienziati, banchieri, politici, premi Nobel, reali, una rete di uomini ricchissimi, dotati dei migliori consulenti legali e fiscali del pianeta, che però sceglievano di affidarsi ad un americano con un’isoletta di dubbio gusto architettonico. Milioni di dollari all’anno ad un “consulente qualunque” non è certamente una pratica usuale per tutti i ricchi del mondo, no?

Quando Black ha minacciato di interrompere i finanziamenti nel 2016, Epstein ha definito i figli di Black “ritardati” per aver “messo in disordine” il suo patrimonio e ha criticato un consulente di Black definendolo “uno spreco di denaro e spazio”. A quanto pare, le tattiche intimidatorie hanno funzionato, dato che Black ha continuato a ricompensare Epstein per i suoi “consigli di investimento” e a concedergli prestiti. Ma i consigli non si limitavano a questo: Black avrebbe chiesto consiglio a Epstein dopo che una sua ex fidanzata lo aveva accusato di violenza sessuale e l’incidente era stato insabbiato con il pagamento di milioni di dollari.

Nel gennaio 2021, sotto la pressione degli investitori istituzionali e dell’opinione pubblica, Black si è dimesso da CEO di Apollo. L’indagine interna aveva concluso che non vi erano prove che Black fosse coinvolto nelle attività criminali di Epstein, ma aveva confermato l’enormità dei pagamenti, cosa che per molti investitori non era più sostenibile. D’altronde il private equity vive di fiducia. I fondi pensione pubblici, le università, le fondazioni non possono permettersi di essere associati a scandali sessuali di portata globale.

Black ha pagato un prezzo altissimo in termini di immagine, ma non in termini patrimoniali, perché il suo patrimonio personale resta stimato in miliardi di dollari.

Il sistema raramente punisce davvero i suoi vertici, più facilmente li sostituisce.

Únete a nosotros en Telegram , Twitter  y VK .

Escríbenos: info@strategic-culture.su

La divulgación, por parte del Departamento de Justicia de Estados Unidos, de más de 3 millones de páginas de documentos a finales de enero de 2026, en virtud de la Ley de Transparencia de los Archivos Epstein firmada por Trump en 2025, reavivó el escrutinio global sobre la extensa red del fallecido financista.

Este conjunto incluye correos electrónicos, registros financieros y memorandos del FBI que ponen de relieve vínculos anteriormente poco difundidos con Israel, sus principales autoridades gubernamentales y círculos de inteligencia. Aún podría haber mucho más por descubrir, ya que solo alrededor del 2% del total de los datos investigativos ha sido divulgado.

Los documentos evidencian los lazos estrechos de Epstein con el régimen sionista. Promovió emprendimientos israelíes en el extranjero, facilitó contactos de alto nivel entre gobiernos y grandes corporaciones extranjeras y las máximas autoridades israelíes, actuó en coordinación con los servicios de inteligencia de Israel y financió el lobby sionista internacional.

Documentos y correos electrónicos revelados muestran que el ex primer ministro y ex ministro de Defensa Ehud Barak mantuvo contacto regular con Epstein durante más de una década, incluso después de la condena de Epstein en 2008 por solicitar prostitución de una menor.

Los intereses empresariales de Barak, especialmente en los sectores de seguridad y tecnología, prosperaron con el respaldo de Epstein. La relación entre ambos era cercana, con intercambios casi diarios de correos y llamadas telefónicas. Epstein escribió a Barak en un mensaje franco: “hay muy pocas personas con las que disfruto pasar tiempo; tú eres excepcional”. Barak respondió: “Gracias. Lo mismo.”

Registros públicos e informes de investigación indican además que Barak visitó residencias de Epstein decenas de veces entre 2013 y 2017, incluida su casa en Nueva York, un apartamento en Manhattan, su mansión en las Islas Vírgenes y vuelos en jets privados.

El portal Drop Site News reveló que el gobierno de Israel, a través de sus diplomáticos acreditados en Estados Unidos y ante la ONU, fue responsable del sistema de vigilancia para Epstein en su apartamento de Manhattan durante dos años a partir de 2016, el cual era frecuentado activamente por Barak.

“Pueden neutralizar el sistema a distancia, antes de que necesites que alguien entre en el apartamento. Lo único que hay que hacer es llamar a Rafi en el consulado e informarle quién y cuándo está entrando”, escribió en enero de 2016 la esposa de Barak, Nili Priell, a una asistente de Epstein.
La correspondencia también indicaba que el trabajo realizado por el gobierno israelí requería la aprobación personal de Epstein. “¡Jeffrey dice que no le importan los agujeros en las paredes y que está todo bien!”, respondió la asistente.

El asesor de Barak, Yoni Koren, fue otro huésped habitual del apartamento de Epstein en Manhattan. El ex oficial de inteligencia militar se alojó allí en varias ocasiones —incluso en 2013, cuando todavía se desempeñaba activamente como jefe de gabinete del Ministerio de Defensa sionista, durante el período en que Barak era ministro bajo el gobierno de Benjamin Netanyahu.

Sin embargo, la comunidad de inteligencia de Estados Unidos no considera que las relaciones de Epstein con los servicios secretos israelíes se limiten a eso. Más allá de los vínculos con diversas compañías vinculadas a miembros de la inteligencia, como FST o Carbyne, el pedófilo también habría prestado personalmente servicios de espionaje a Israel.

Un informante encubierto del FBI afirmó que “quedó convencido” de que Epstein era un espía israelí, según un documento de la oficina del FBI en Los Ángeles de 2020.

El registro señala que el informante, conocido en la jerga oficial como fuente humana confidencial (CHS, por sus siglas en inglés), recordó que el abogado de Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, dijo al entonces fiscal federal para el Distrito Sur de Florida, Alexander Acosta, “que Epstein pertenecía tanto a los servicios de inteligencia de Estados Unidos como a servicios aliados”.

“La CHS compartió llamadas telefónicas entre Dershowitz y Epstein, durante las cuales él/ella tomó notas. Después de esas llamadas, el Mossad llamaba a Dershowitz para recabar información. Epstein era cercano al ex primer ministro de Israel, Ehud Barak, y fue entrenado como espía bajo su orientación”, afirma el documento.

Señalando que Barak “creía que Netanyahu era un criminal”, el texto indica que el informante “quedó convencido de que Epstein era un agente del Mossad cooptado”, en medio de rivalidades internas que involucraban al régimen.

Las declaraciones del ex oficial de inteligencia israelí Ari Ben-Menashe, quien sostuvo que Epstein y su asociada Ghislaine Maxwell operaban para el Mossad desde la década de 1980, refuerzan esas sospechas. Según Ben-Menashe, utilizaban el chantaje en operaciones similares a las presuntamente dirigidas por el padre de Ghislaine, Robert Maxwell —frecuentemente señalado como colaborador del Mossad.

El propio Epstein parecía sospechar que el Mossad desempeñó un papel en la misteriosa muerte de Maxwell en 1991. Un correo electrónico enviado por Epstein en 2018 tenía como asunto “él falleció”, en referencia a Maxwell. En el mensaje, Epstein afirmó que Maxwell había amenazado al servicio de inteligencia israelí, escribiendo que “a menos que ellos [el Mossad] le dieran 400 millones de libras para salvar su imperio en ruinas, revelaría todo lo que había hecho por ellos”.

Epstein también sostuvo que Maxwell actuaba como un agente informal, recopilando información sobre Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido y la Unión Soviética.

Aún queda mucho por revelarse al público y es evidente que las autoridades estadounidenses están obstaculizando la divulgación completa de los archivos de Epstein para encubrir sus vínculos con las personas más poderosas del mundo. Pero lo que ya ha salido a la luz deja escaso margen de duda sobre el papel de Epstein en la política exterior del Estado de Israel — un Estado mafioso, delictivo y fraudulento.

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

The latest tranche of Epstein Files has put a rather unlikely figure in the spotlight: the Dalai Lama. The Tibetan religious leader’s name is mentioned hundreds of times in the newly-released documents, with suggestions and allegations that the two maintained some kind of personal relationship. A search for “Dalai Lama” elicits 156 results on the Department of Justice’s website, with other similar queries, such as “Dali Lama” (Epstein had notoriously poor spelling) also prompting dozens of relevant results. A prominent Epstein guest recalls meeting the Buddhist teacher at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion, scene of many of his most serious sex crimes. The Dalai Lama’s office has vehemently denied any connection to the disgraced pedophile and suspected Israeli intelligence operative.

Partying At Epstein’s House?

A serial networker, Epstein’s emails show that he worked hard to connect with the Dalai Lama, sending requests out to his web of contacts for an invitation. Joichi Ito, head of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Media Lab, helped him in his endeavors, noting that his close contact, Tenzin Priyadarshi was a Tibetan monk, MIT’s Buddhist chaplain, and had a direct line to the Dalai Lama. As he wrote:

“Yes. First step would be to meet Tenzin. His student who runs the Dalai Lama center and is now a Director’s Fellow at the Lab and going to start the ‘ethics initiative’ at the Media Lab. We’re working on some cool things like a meeting about cognitive machines and man. I think you’ll probably like him. He can get us the Dalai Lama.”

Epstein would go on to meet with Priyadarshi and donate $50,000 to the Prajnopaya Institute, a Buddhist Center he founded. In 2019, Ito resigned in disgrace over his association with Epstein.

Epstein was excited by the prospect of reeling the lama into his personal network. “I’m working on the dalai lama for dinner” he emailed Soon Yi-Previn, wife of Woody Allen. “Any date for the lunch with Woody and dalai L?” celebrity scientist Lawrence Krauss asked Epstein two weeks later.

Another message from a redacted sender also hints at a closer relationship than previously known.

“Sorry for that didn’t check my email since yesterday morning. You know that I don’t have an Internet in my phone, why didn’t you call me or text me on my phone if you need me? About the event I told you almost a month ago on the island that Dalai Lama is coming and I want to go there to see him. But I can skip this event if you need my help today.” 

It is not clear whether the reference to the “island” is Little St. James, the infamous Caribbean retreat where the billionaire trafficked and raped girls and women.

From the emails alone, it is unclear whether Epstein and the Dalai Lama ever met in person. However, Michael Wolff, journalist and Epstein associate, stated multiple times that he personally saw him at Epstein’s Manhattan residence.

Wolff told The Daily Beast Podcast that Epstein’s gigantic apartment was “filled with people you might want to meet, from Bill Gates, to Peter Thiel, to Larry Summers, Ehud Barak, Steve Bannon, Noam Chomsky, the Dalai Lama.” Host Joanna Coles interrupted Wolff, asking, “You met the Dalai Lama?” “Yeah, the list goes on, the list is extraordinary,” he replied. A shocked Coles asked him once again to clarify: “Did you actually meet the Dalai Lama at Jeffrey Epstein’s?” to which Wolff responded, “Yeah, indeed.”

The Central Tibetan Administration has categorically denied both Wolff’s claims and any deep connections between Epstein and the Dalai Lama. After analyzing the documents themselves, they concluded that they were marked by an “absence of any direct participation, confirmation, or acknowledgement by His Holiness the Dalai Lama, or by anyone acting on his behalf, in relation to Jeffrey Epstein.”

“All references to His Holiness the Dalai Lama are strictly third-party mentions, often informal, speculative, or contextual, and do not establish any interaction, relationship, or communication between His Holiness and Jeffrey Epstein,” they concluded, adding that reports stating otherwise are often the work of “Chinese state-backed media outlets” with “vested interests” against the Tibetan independence movement.

Nevertheless, the presence of the Dalai Lama in the Epstein Files evoke memories of a 2023 incident involving a young boy. At a public event in India, the then-87-year-old leader invited a child on stage, ordering him to kiss him on the cheek. Holding the boy in place, he motions to his lips, saying “I think here also.” Cupping the boy’s chin, he kisses him on the mouth, as the audience applauds. Still holding the child, he then orders him to “suck his tongue.” The visibly shaken boy pulls back in disgust.

Weeks afterward, video from the incident went viral. The Dalai Lama was condemned by Indian children’s groups, and widely accused of pedophilia. Facing a media storm, his office put out a short statement apologizing to the boy, his family, and “his many friends across the world, for the hurt his words may have caused.” “His Holiness often teases people he meets in an innocent and playful way, even in public and before cameras. He regrets the incident,” the note explained.

While the Dalai Lama has strenuously denied the Epstein and child abuse allegations, he has been completely open about his connections to the CIA and U.S. intelligence, groups with whom Epstein is alleged to have had close relations. For decades, the Dalai Lama was on the CIA payroll, personally receiving $180,000 per year from the agency, as part of a wider American strategy to support the Tibetan separatist movement against Communist China.

After a failed 1959 uprising, he left Tibet for India, never to return. The CIA continued to support Tibetan guerillas, however, arming, training and funding hundreds of fighters at Camp Hale in Colorado, in an attempt to destabilize the government. But after the Nixon administration’s détente with China in the early 1970s, Tibetan independence was placed on the back burner, and the CIA money for the program, including the Dalai Lama’s personal stipend, dried up. “Once the American policy toward China changed, they [the CIA] stopped their help. Otherwise, our struggle could have gone on,” the Dalai Lama said of the decision.

The CIA continues to fund Tibetan movements through front organizations such as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). Every year, the NED spends millions bankrolling programs targeting Tibet, supporting media, NGOs, and other Tibetan groups who oppose the Chinese government. There are currently at least 16 active Tibetan NED projects, although the organization does not disclose who are the recipients of their largesse, for fear it would reduce their credibility. Nevertheless, NGOs such as the Tibet Justice Center and the Tibetan Center for Human Rights and Democracy are known to be financed by Washington. As are Students for a Free Tibet and media such as the China Digital Times and China Change.

The purpose of these operations, one declassified State Department document notes, is “to keep the political concept of an autonomous Tibet alive within Tibet and among foreign nations, principally India, and to build a capability for resistance against possible political developments inside Communist China.”

Bad Karma

The release of the Epstein Files has made waves across the world, as celebrities, scientists, politicians, and royals have been implicated in a vast network of trafficking and sexual abuse. In the United Kingdom, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (formerly known as Prince Andrew) was arrested, while the house of ex-cabinet member, Lord Mandelson, was raided by the police. Meanwhile, in Norway, former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland has been charged with aggravated corruption relating to his dealings with the disgraced New York financier.

In the United States, however, not a single individual has faced legal consequences for their actions. Moreover, the Department of Justice announced that the January 30 release of 3 million pages of documents would be its last, as it had met its legal obligations. This, despite only 2% of the total Epstein files it holds having been published (and many heavily redacted, at that).

Why Epstein wished to meet the Dalai Lama so much is unclear. The billionaire appeared to enjoy “collecting” well-known figures. The Dalai Lama himself is remaining tight-lipped. And with Epstein dead and no more files scheduled to be released, it is likely that we may never hear the final word on this mystery.

Original article:  www.mintpressnews.com

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

Things are heating up in the UK over the Epstein affair, and while the press have a field day with daily revelations, it is becoming clearer and clearer who will be protected from prosecution and who will be sent to the gallows. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, it would seem, has been thrown under a bus by his brother, the King, who could simply take no more of the sleazy reports in the press about underage girls and Andrew selling off secrets relating to the country to Epstein. Something had to be done to make a clear statement, if for nothing else, to protect the British royal family from being dragged down into the sewer with Andrew.

The arrest by UK police of Andrew on the morning of 19th February is interesting as it throws up a number of questions which surely British journalists will not bother asking. Namely, why did it take so long? And perhaps more importantly, who actually made the decision that Andrew had to be arrested?

Of course, this last question is part of a broader one which I tackled in an earlier article, which is who is actually running Britain, as, certainly, it is not the royal family.

We can assume that British police, who have been investigating specifically the use of British airports like Stansted to assist in the trafficking of young girls and Andrew’s role in that, have uncovered hard evidence and were ready to move. But it is also as though someone in the UK, very powerful, is directing these decisions. One obvious explanation is the Rothschild banking family, which has very close connections with the British royal family and, as they are at the heart of the Epstein so-called investigation on both sides of the Atlantic, are calling the shots. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Peter Mandelson, who worked for them and who lives in a house owned by them, has so far not faced any real hard investigation or questioning by UK police, despite his crimes being as weighty as Andrew’s.

So, if the Rothschilds have decided that Andrew would be a very good sacrificial lamb to lead to the slaughter, which can bring back some credibility to the House of Windsor and Charles as monarch, we can expect him to do jail time and to be hung out to dry. But the Rothschilds might have decided that Andrew had to be used in such a way as it also drives media attention away from Trump and other key figures who are still in power and serving their masters — but who are certainly implicated in the tawdry affair of trafficking underage girls around the world for their revolting carnality.

It’s clear though that whoever is running the UK and controlling the royal family, this scandal will certainly threaten the stability of the House of Windsor, which is suffering from the bad press, with a debate starting to happen around the country as to whether the role of the royals needs an overhaul. King Charles will be more than aware that the British public are angry and are directing that rage at him, as was recently the case when he was heckled in public by members of a crowd.

The news though of Andrew’s arrest is shocking and will reverberate around the world for days to come. Never in the history of the royal family has any member been arrested like this. You have to go back to 1957, when a trove of secret service documents was made available to Queen Elizabeth II which showed beyond any doubt that the former King Edward VIII, while in exile living in Portugal during the war, was in fact colluding with the Nazis and was hoping that Germany would overpower Britain and reinstall him as monarch. He could have been tried for treason, but the Queen chose to not go ahead with such a brutal treatment.

For Andrew, it seems there is no depth profound enough for his brother King Charles to push the knife in. It is as though he wants to make an example of Andrew, and the police may well press charges in the coming days which will certainly mean jail time. That is, of course, if all we are seeing is not an elaborate PR stunt designed to humiliate Andrew but nothing more. The escape plan of leaving the UK and rushing to the UAE, where the emir there has already given him a lavish apartment in Abu Dhabi, seems less and less far-fetched as the days continue. What is notable about the arrest of Andrew is that journalists have hinted that it is based on his abuse of power, which of course is about selling state secrets, not about the depraved life he led in the vortex of Epstein’s paedo sex ring.

Junte-se a nós no Telegram , Twitter e VK.

Escreva para nós: info@strategic-culture.su

Os Arquivos Epstein mostraram o comprometimento dos ícones do neoateísmo com o pedófilo canibal. Uma vez que o neoateísmo está comprometido com o sionismo, a relação entre o judeu praticante Jeffrey Epstein e os neoateísmo não pode se limitar a um apoio utilitário que tenha em vista somente descobertas científicas. Passemos em revista os ícones do neoateísmo.

O neoateísmo, seja como movimento organizado ou fenômeno de internet, despontou nos anos 2000. O público-alvo eram jovens interessados em ciências, e de fato é impossível encontrar um divulgador científico que não seja no mínimo agnóstico. Essa categoria tal como a conhecemos hoje – o divulgador científico midiático – provavelmente teve o seu primeiro espécime na pessoa de Carl Sagan (1934 – 1996), um cientista medíocre caçador de OVNIs que tinha acesso privilegiado à mídia e se colocava como uma espécie de encarnação da racionalidade, o que inclui ser um ateu cientificista que representa a religião como uma simples decorrência da ignorância e dos temores humanos. Não obstante, esse sumo sacerdote da racionalidade chegou a se entusiasmar com o projeto da NASA de ensinar inglês a golfinhos sob o efeito de LSD, e até fundou a Ordem do Golfinho, uma sociedade secreta composta por cientistas interessados em ETs. Em vez de ser um ateu agressivo (vale lembrar que ele era dos EUA e os EUA têm preconceito contra ateus), Sagan adotava uma filosofia espinosana e citava Einstein. Era, portanto, mais um judeu ateu.

As personagens principais

Os marcos históricos do neoateísmo são editoriais. Em 2004, o jovem jornalista californiano Sam Harris (n. 1967) publica A Morte da Fé: Religião, terror e o futuro da razão, que é uma diatribe contra a “religião organizada” como causadora de todo tipo de mal. O livro foi um best seller – coisa impressionante em se tratando dos Estados Unidos; explicável, porém, pelo trauma recente do atentado às Torres Gêmeas. Pela argumentação do pioneiro, basta ser religioso para sair cometendo atentados terroristas por aí. Quanto à origem religiosa, Sam Harris é filho de pai quacre com mãe judia, o que faz dele um judeu segundo a Halachá. Vale destacar que Sam Harris não é um ateu compatível com o racionalismo típico dos divulgadores de ciência, já que é adepto de esoterismos, abriu-se para a “espiritualidade” com drogas e foi até o Tibete estudar meditação com o pedófilo Dalai Lama. Talvez o problema de Harris seja só com a “religião organizada”, leia-se, com instituições e doutrina sólidas, em vez de religiões desorganizadas que cultuam gurus esotéricos. Em 2009, já depois da fama, sua busca por uma moralidade científica garantiu-lhe um doutorado em neurociência (não em filosofia: neurociência!), mas ele não exerceu a vida acadêmica.

O segundo nome importante na cronologia é o inglês Richard Dawkins (n. 1949), um professor de Oxford com vida própria, independente da militância ateia. Dawkins é quem melhor encarna o ideal do neoateu: é um cientista de verdade com obra reconhecida, coloca o darwinismo como prova de que a ciência contradiz a religião (considerada tacitamente um sinônimo de criacionismo), é ateu desde a adolescência e trata todo religioso como um lunático imbecil. Após o sucesso editorial de Sam Harris, o editor aceita a sua antiga proposta de fazer um livro contra a religião. Em 2006, sai Deus: Um delírio, um livro radical segundo o qual todo aquele que crê em Deus está literalmente delirando. Quanto às suas origens, Dawkins nasceu no Quênia Britânico, filho de pais anglicanos. Foi ele quem lançou a moda de dizer-se “culturalmente cristão”, ou “culturalmente anglicano” (Pinker se diz “culturalmente judeu”) – e aí nos perguntamos como um cientista super científico pode ser culturalmente delirante.

O filósofo estadunidense Daniel Dennett (1942 – 2024) é a figura de origem mais interessante. Seu pai era PhD em estudos islâmicos e ele passou a infância no Líbano, porque seu pai estava lá a serviço do OSS (órgão precursor da CIA). Daniel Dennett chama-se Daniel Clement Dennett III, e seu pai era Daniel Clement Dennett Jr. Ele teve três livros importantes para nosso assunto: Consciousness Explained (1991), onde dá uma explicação materialista da mente ou da alma (toda a consciência e o pensamento coincidiriam com atividade cerebral); Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (1995), que lastreia a moralidade no darwinismo (alinhado com a tese de Harris); e, já durante o fenômeno do neoateísmo, publica Breaking the Spell (2006), no qual pretende que se busquem explicações evolutivas para a existência da religião. Nesse livro, em vez de chamar-se de ateu, ele se declara “brilhante”, e estimula um movimento chamado The Brights (“os brilhantes”), de “naturalistas filosóficos”. Isso incluiria tanto ateus radicais como Dawkins quanto personalidades nuançadas como Einstein.

Por fim, há o jornalista inglês Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011). Ele teve uma trajetória esquerdista liberal na maior parte da sua vida, com passagem pelo Labour e pelo trotskismo. Foi amigo dos importantes antissionistas Edward Said, Israel Shahak e Noam Chomsky. Não obstante, sua trajetória muda em 2001, quando apoia a invasão do Iraque, animado pelo atentado às Torres Gêmeas. Em 2007, no calor do neoateísmo, lança God is Not Great, negando a frase árabe “Allahu Akbar”. Quanto às suas origens, foi criado como cristão e somente aos 38 anos descobriu que sua mãe tinha origem judaica pela via materna, e aí passou a se autoidentificar como judeu. A crermos no obituário feito pela revista identitária judaica Tablet Mag, Hitchens via no ateísmo um remédio judaico para evitar o totalitarismo. Na mesma peça, aprendemos que sua mãe era uma louca New Age que cometeu suicídio junto com seu amante, um ex-pastor que a levou para a seita de um guru indiano. Longe de rechaçar a loucura como um bom ateu racionalista, Hitchens via a adesão da mãe ao modismo como uma característica dialética do judaísmo.

Considerações

Algo que sempre me chamou a atenção no neoateísmo é a implausibilidade de sua alegação principal: que todo religioso é burro, de modo que só ateus são científicos e inteligentes. O ateísmo era muito raro antes do século passado, e o único grande cientista inequivocamente ateu de que se tem notícia é Darwin. O fato de essa ideia se espalhar no país de Isaac Newton é ainda mais descabido, já que esse gênio da ciência, além de ser um exegeta bíblico obstinado e dado a misticismos, era também uma espécie de proto-criacionista, já que acreditava num Criador versado em matemática e inspirou as Boyle Lectures. Não seria arriscado dizer que o neoateísmo teve por finalidade combater o fantasma de Newton a fim de divorciar o cristianismo da ciência, fazendo crer que, se você é cristão, você é burro. Já se for judeu, há uma porção de provas científicas de que o QI está atrelado à raça – provas, aliás, dadas por James Watson, ganhador do Nobel e enésimo cientista a aparecer nos Arquivos Epstein.

Pois bem, olhando para esses breves rascunhos biográficos, vejo que só um dos “quatro cavaleiros” corresponde à imagem do ateu inequivocamente ateu que despreza tudo o que não é espelho. O iniciador da moda, Sam Harris, é um esotérico que crê que a ciência pode fazer as vezes de religião, dando um guiamento moral cientificamente correto. Ele bem poderia ser um espinosano, um tipo que crê que Deus é a mesma coisa que a natureza. Hitchens acreditava que o ateísmo era uma virtude judaica, de modo que seu ateísmo está vinculado a essa religião racial. Quem se aproxima mais do radicalismo do gentio Dawkins é o também gentio Dennett. Ambos têm em comum uma agressividade darwinista que não parece aberta a uma divinização da natureza, a qual Darwin descreve como um verdadeiro mundo cão. No entanto, Dennett segue a faceta menos divulgada de Darwin, que enxerga na solidariedade social um mecanismo evolutivo da espécie: enquanto Dawkins fraciona o indivíduo para falar de gene egoísta, Dennett prefere dar atenção à seleção de coletividades altruístas. Além disso, em vez de colocar-se simplesmente como ateu, preferiu filiar-se a um movimento de “naturalistas” autodeclarados brilhantes. Excetuado Dawkins, todos apontam para uma zona ambígua entre ateísmo e deísmo, abrindo espaço para qualquer bobajada New Age na qual se possa botar números para chamar de ciência. Nada muito diferente de Sagan embasbacado com golfinhos sob efeito de LSD.

Agora, a divinização da natureza explicaria também a reverência de um judeu religioso como Epstein diante de mecanismos de seleção natural. É comum apontar para a relação entre calvinismo e darwinismo por causa da noção de predestinação. No entanto, um deísmo espinosano e materialista levaria a uma divinização do próprio mecanismo de seleção natural.

Um assunto que é um elefante na sala é o sionismo. Sob qualquer luz racional, o sionismo deveria ser rejeitado por ateus que odeiam a “religião organizada”, já que Israel é um Estado religioso que se lastreia numa promessa feita por Deus a Abraão. Não obstante, a conduta padrão de três neoateus é focar no islamismo: é como se Israel fosse um Estado laico e o conflito só existisse porque os muçulmanos são fanáticos, e não porque as suas propriedades (bem como as dos cristãos) foram roubadas. Dennett não parece ter se pronunciado sobre o assunto, mas ele não era muito midiático. Hitchens, embora se dissesse antissionista e argumentasse com base no liberalismo, na prática apoiava o Estado de Israel porque apoiou efusivamente a invasão do Iraque. Os judeus são representados como seres racionais e iluminados (mesmo que em Israel não falte fanatismo religioso judaico); só os palestinos são religiosos obscurantistas cheios de ódio.

E como Epstein nos trouxe até aqui, vale lembrar mais uma vez que dois dos citados estavam no Lolita Express de Epstein (Dawkins e Dennett), e que Sam Harris recebia financiamento de Epstein para a sua ONG de ateus que se acham geniais (Fundação Edge, ou Edge.Org).

Também discutimos no artigo anterior as crenças de Epstein, e aqui reaparece aquele materialismo anímico, que faz da alma uma coisa material que está no cérebro, mesmo que não possamos vê-la. Dennett dá a fundamentação filosófica a essa convicção. Quanto às correspondências com a Renascença, a ideia darwinista de uma moralidade inerente à natureza tem precedente no De rerum natura, já que não são só os corpos biológicos que se compõem segundo uma ordem, mas também os corpos sociopolíticos, os quais vão se constituindo espontaneamente e se desagregam quando padecem de alguma desordem interna.

Um outro assunto instigante que ainda não abordamos (porque ainda estou me inteirando) é o da tentativa, na Renascença, de superar a divisão do cristianismo ocidental através de uma nova religião fundada nas revelações de Hermes Trismegistos. Os herméticos acreditavam que Moisés, Pitágoras e Platão viajaram até o Egito para aprender toda a sua sabedoria desse tal Hermes. Assim, o cristianismo poderia voltar às suas verdadeiras raízes junto com o judaísmo, já que Hermes era o professor de Moisés. Daí vêm o hermetismo, a cabala cristã e o início do movimento ocultista.

Por fim, fica a dúvida: se o ocultismo não professa publicamente tudo aquilo em que acredita, será possível que o ateísmo militante seja a camada exotérica de uma religião hermética? Será que, com a ascensão do cientificismo, o sobrenatural (ou preternatural) foi privatizado para pequenos círculos iniciados que frequentam festas estranhas com templos em ilhas privadas, enquanto todas as instituições dizem que nada de sobrenatural existe?

Join us on Telegram, Twitter, and VK.

Contact us: info@strategic-culture.su

The Epstein Files revealed the commitment of neo-atheist icons to the cannibalistic pedophile. Since neo-atheism is committed to Zionism, the relationship between the observant Jew Jeffrey Epstein and neo-atheism cannot be limited to utilitarian support aimed solely at scientific discoveries. Let’s review the icons of neo-atheism.

Neo-atheism, whether as an organized movement or an internet phenomenon, emerged in the 2000s. The target audience was young people interested in science, and in fact, it is impossible to find a science communicator who isn’t at least agnostic. This category, as we know it today – the media-savvy science communicator – probably had its first specimen in Carl Sagan (1934–1996), a mediocre UFO-hunting scientist who had privileged access to the media and presented himself as a kind of embodiment of rationality, which includes being a scientistic atheist who explains religion as a simple consequence of human ignorance and fears. Nevertheless, this high priest of rationality became enthusiastic about NASA’s project to teach English to dolphins under the influence of LSD, and even founded the “Order of the Dolphin”, a secret society composed of scientists interested in ETs. Instead of being an aggressive atheist (it’s worth remembering that he was from the USA and the USA has prejudice against atheists), Sagan adopted a Spinozan philosophy and quoted Einstein. He was, therefore, just another Jewish atheist.

The main characters

The historical milestones of neo-atheism are editorial. In 2004, the young Californian journalist Sam Harris (b. 1967) published The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason, a diatribe against “organized religion” as the cause of all kinds of evil. The book was a bestseller – an impressive deed, considering that it was in the United States; explainable, however, by the recent trauma of the attack on the Twin Towers. According to the pioneer’s argument, simply being religious is enough to commit terrorist attacks. Regarding his religious background, Sam Harris is the son of a Quaker father and a Jewish mother, making him Jewish according to Halacha. It is worth noting that Sam Harris is not an atheist compatible with the rationalism typical of science communicators, since he is an adherent of esotericism, opened himself to “spirituality” with drugs, and even went to Tibet to study meditation with the pedophile Dalai Lama. Perhaps Harris’s problem lies solely with “organized religion”—that is, religion with solid institutions and doctrine, rather than disorganized religions that worship esoteric gurus. In 2009, after achieving fame, his pursuit of scientific morality earned him a PhD in neuroscience (not philosophy: neuroscience!), but he did not pursue an academic career.

The second important name in the chronology is the Englishman Richard Dawkins (b. 1949), an Oxford professor with a life of his own, independent of atheist activism. Dawkins best embodies the ideal of the neo-atheist: he is a true scientist with a recognized work, he presents Darwinism as proof that science contradicts religion (which tacitly considered a synonym for creationism), he has been an atheist since adolescence, and he treats all religious people as imbecile lunatics. After the publishing success of Sam Harris, the publisher accepted his old proposal to write a book against religion. In 2006, The God Delusion was published, a radical book according to which anyone who believes in God is literally delusional. As for his origins, Dawkins was born in British Kenya, the son of Anglican parents. He was the one who started the trend of calling oneself “culturally Christian,” or “culturally Anglican” (Pinker calls himself “culturally Jewish”) – and then we wonder how a super-scientific scientist can be culturally delusional.

The American philosopher Daniel Dennett (1942–2024) is the most interesting figure in terms of background. His father had a PhD in Islamic studies, and he spent his childhood in Lebanon because his father was there working for the OSS (a precursor to the CIA). Daniel Dennett’s full name was Daniel Clement Dennett III, and his father was Daniel Clement Dennett Jr. He wrote three important books relevant to our topic: Consciousness Explained (1991), where he offers a materialistic explanation of the mind or soul (all consciousness and thought would coincide with brain activity); Darwin’s Dangerous Idea (1995), which bases morality on Darwinism (aligned with Harris’s thesis); and, during the neo-atheism phenomenon, he published Breaking the Spell (2006), in which he aims to seek evolutionary explanations for the existence of religion. In this book, instead of calling himself an atheist, he declares himself a “bright,” and encourages a movement called The Brights, of “philosophical naturalists.” This would include both radical atheists like Dawkins and nuanced personalities like Einstein.

Finally, there is the English journalist Christopher Hitchens (1949-2011). He had a liberal leftist trajectory for most of his life, with a stint in Labour and Trotskyism. He was a friend of the important anti-Zionists Edward Said, Israel Shahak, and Noam Chomsky. However, his trajectory changes in 2001, when he supports the invasion of Iraq, encouraged by the attack on the Twin Towers. In 2007, in the heat of neo-atheism, he publishes God is Not Great, denying the Arabic phrase “Allahu Akbar.” As for his origins, he was raised as a Christian and only at the age of 38 did he found out that his mother had Jewish origins on her mother’s side, and then he began to self-identify as Jewish. According to the obituary published by the Jewish identitarian magazine Tablet Mag, Hitchens saw atheism as a Jewish remedy to avoid totalitarianism. In the same article, we learn that his mother was a New Age lunatic who committed suicide along with her lover, a former pastor who led her to the sect of an Indian guru. Far from rejecting madness like a good rationalist atheist, Hitchens saw his mother’s adherence to such a fad as a dialectical characteristic of Judaism.

Considerations

Something that has always struck me about neo-atheism is the implausibility of its main claim: that all religious people are stupid, so only atheists are scientific and intelligent. Atheism was very rare before the last century, and the only great scientist who was unequivocally atheist that we know of is Darwin. The fact that this idea spread in Isaac Newton’s country is even more absurd, since this scientific genius, besides being an obstinate biblical exegete prone to mysticism, was also a kind of proto-creationist, believing in a Creator versed in mathematics and inspiring the Boyle Lectures. It wouldn’t be risky to say that neo-atheism aimed to combat the ghost of Newton in order to divorce Christianity from science, making people believe that if you are Christian, you are stupid. If you are Jewish, however, there is a lot of scientific evidence that IQ is linked to race – evidence, incidentally, provided by James Watson, Nobel laureate and the umpteenth scientist to appear in the Epstein Files.

Well, looking at these brief biographical sketches, I see that only one of the “four horsemen” corresponds to the image of the unequivocally atheistic atheist who despises everything that is not a mirror. The initiator of the trend, Sam Harris, is an esotericist who believes that science can act as a substitute for religion, providing scientifically correct moral guidance. He could finely be a Spinozist, a type who believes that God is the same thing as nature. Hitchens believed that atheism was a Jewish virtue, so his atheism is linked to that racial religion. The one who comes closest to the radicalism of the gentile Dawkins is the also gentile Dennett. Both have in common a Darwinian aggressiveness that does not seem open to a divinization of nature, which Darwin describes as a true dog-eat-dog world. However, Dennett follows the less publicized facet of Darwin, who sees social solidarity as an evolutionary mechanism of the species: while Dawkins fragments the individuals to speak of a selfish gene, Dennett prefers to pay attention to the selection of altruistic collectivities. Furthermore, instead of simply positioning himself as an atheist, he preferred to join a movement of self-proclaimed bright “naturalists.” Except for Dawkins, they all point to an ambiguous zone between atheism and deism, opening space for any New Age quackery in which you can put numbers and say it is science. Nothing very different from Sagan being amazed by dolphins under the influence of LSD.

Now, the divinization of nature would also explain the reverence of a religious Jew like Epstein towards mechanisms of natural selection. It is common to point to the relationship between Calvinism and Darwinism because of the notion of predestination. However, a Spinozan and materialist deism would lead to a divinization of the very mechanism of natural selection.

One issue that is an elephant in the room is Zionism. Under any rational light, Zionism should be rejected by atheists who hate “organized religion,” since Israel is a religious state based on a promise made by God to Abraham. Nevertheless, the standard conduct of three neo-atheists is to focus on Islam: it is as if Israel were a secular state and the conflict only existed because Muslims are fanatics, and not because their property (as well as that of Christians) was stolen. Dennett does not seem to have commented on the subject, but he was not very media-savvy. Hitchens, although he called himself anti-Zionist and argued on the basis of liberalism, in practice supported the State of Israel because he enthusiastically supported the invasion of Iraq. Jews are represented as rational and enlightened beings (even though Jewish religious fanaticism is not lacking in Israel); only Palestinians are obscurantist religious people full of hatred.

And as Epstein brought us to this point, it’s worth remembering once again that two of those mentioned were on Epstein’s Lolita Express (Dawkins and Dennett), and that Sam Harris received funding from Epstein for his NGO of atheists who think they’re geniuses (Edge Foundation, or Edge.Org).

We also discussed Epstein’s beliefs in the previous article, and here that psychic materialism reappears, which makes the soul a material thing that is in the brain, even if we cannot see it. Dennett provides the philosophical foundation for this conviction. As for the correspondences with the Renaissance, the Darwinian idea of ​​a morality inherent in nature has precedent in De rerum natura, since it is not only biological bodies that are composed according to an order, but also sociopolitical bodies, which are spontaneously constituted and disintegrate when they suffer from some internal disorder.

Another intriguing topic that we haven’t yet addressed (because I’m still getting up to speed) is the attempt, during the Renaissance, to overcome the division of Western Christianity through a new religion founded on the revelations of Hermes Trismegistus. The Hermeticists believed that Moses, Pythagoras, and Plato traveled to Egypt to learn all their wisdom from this guy Hermes. Thus, Christianity could return to its true roots along with Judaism, since Hermes was Moses’ teacher. Hence come Hermeticism, Christian Kabbalah, and the beginning of the occult movement.

Finally, the question remains: if occultism doesn’t publicly profess everything it believes in, is it possible that militant atheism is the exoteric layer of a Hermetic religion? Could it be that, with the rise of scientism, the supernatural (or preternatural) has been privatized for small initiated circles that frequent strange parties with temples on private islands, while all institutions say that nothing supernatural exists?